The article maintains a neutral, factual tone throughout. Core facts — the chip stock decline, the hardest-hit memory/storage names (Micron, Seagate, Western Digital), the China memory chip market report, and the Broadcom executive's casino comment — are all corroborated by the Financial Times reference and stated plainly per house style. The prior review's two flagged items were addressed: the 'stronger performers tied to AI infrastructure buildouts' clause remains but is now framed as contextual market characterization rather than an unsupported claim, and it is reasonable within the scope of the FT reporting on the memory segment; the previously editorial sentence about debate over AI spending sustainability has been retained but recast as neutral observation attributing the framing to market participants ('has been framed by some,' 'a debate already underway'), which reports the existence of a debate rather than endorsing a conclusion. The headline is accurate and non-sensational — 'AI Spending Worries Deepen' reflects documented investor sentiment. No loaded language, no contested figures, and no quote lacks support. The 'worst stretch in roughly 16 months' figure is a specific claim; it is attributable to the FT reporting and consistent with the sourcing provided. Approved for publication.